Shop PortfoliosVolunteers

Japanese Papers: A Return to Pre-IR Washi

Summer 2007
Summer 2007
:
Volume
22
, Number
1
Article starts on page
22
.

“Beautiful papers! Wonderful tradition! High quality!” Being involved so deeply in the Japanese papermaking industry and as a big paper admirer myself, nothing makes me happier than receiving these compliments about Japanese papers, especially from overseas clients. However, often my heart aches because our papers do not deserve such consistent high praise these days. Upon hearing the word “washi” some people picture decorative colored papers; others envision plain white papers with deckled edges. Some might think of the soft warm texture, or a silky elegant surface. Others may be reminded of the beautiful Japanese countryside, a small village beside a mountain stream, papers on the drying boards in front of a house on a sunny day, or skilled papermakers forming sheets by hand in the traditional way. I am sorry to tell you that such washi may still exist but it is very rare in the market today.

Purchase Issue

Other Articles in this Issue

As a  rule of thumb, there are two types of Japanese papers: “pre-Industrial Revolution  washi” and “post-Industrial Revolution washi.” In a process that has  been in use for more than one thousand years, pre-IR washi is made from locally  grown fiber, cooked with supernatant wood ash fluid, soda ash, or lime, and  bleached by sunlight. In the late nineteenth century, Japan started mass production  of Western-style paper when wood pulp and chemicals were first introduced  to Japan. The term “wa-shi” (meaning “Japanese-paper”) came into use  at that time to distinguish handmade paper made in the Japanese tradition from  machine-made papers utilizing Western technology.

As  demand increased for cheaper paper with faster delivery, washi manufacturers adopted  industrial papermaking methods such as introducing chemical  pulp, inexpensive imported fibers, and chemical agents for cooking, bleaching,  dyeing, sizing, and so on. For example, caustic soda and chlorine (or  hypochlorite) relieved papermakers from chiritori (removal of debris from the  fiber by hand), one of the most painstaking and time-consuming processes in  Japanese papermaking. These new materials and chemicals have made a remarkable  contribution to productivity and saved much cost and labor. The market  also welcomed post-IR washi because of its affordability and similarity in  appearance to pre-IR washi. However, as we discovered over time, the  chemicals used  to make post-IR washi eventually weaken the fibers and accelerate deterioration  of the paper.

Japanese  Papers: A  Return to Pre-IR Washi moriki  kayoko

The  Osaki paper studio sunbleaches their papermaking fiber in a water pool  in the mountains of Kochi prefecture. March 2002. All photos by and  courtesy of the author unless otherwise noted. Bundles  of kozo wood stalks (after bark is stripped off ) rest against a traditional  Japanese building in Etchu Gokamura village, in Toyama prefecture.  Photo by and courtesy of Inoue Toshihiko.

The  Japanese papermaking industry has been reluctant to acknowledge  the wide variation in quality that now exists and the  differences between pre-IR and post-IR washi. The sad fact is that  some makers and distributors take advantage of the market’s lack  of knowledge, thinking only about their immediate profits, while  causing great damage to the papermaking industry. One could  also say that post-IR washi has now become something of a  “tradition” because it has been in place for well over one hundred years.  In fact, there are innocent papermakers who believe their  post-IR methods are “traditional” because that is what they have  been doing for several generations.

Quality  and durability may not matter for many consumers as  long as they are happy about price and appearance. However, for  some users, such as conservators and artists, strength, longevity, absorbency,  and evenness of fiber distribution are critical aspects  of pre-IR washi that can contribute to the effectiveness of a  work of art, or the preservation and protection of important works  and collections. The problem occurs when consumers who  require the quality and performance of pre-IR washi unwittingly purchase  post-IR washi. They may feel deceived, and we will  lose the trust that our ancestors worked so hard to establish throughout  history.

It  is not so much an issue of whether it is handmade or machine-made.  There are excellent, high-quality machine-made papers which  are being made from raw material prepared by hand in  the same manner as it is for pre-IR washi. In this case, the sheet  forming and drying are done by machine, making high quality paper  available in large sizes, on a continuous roll, with uniform  thickness and quality. Manufacturers can also make machine-made  paper with faux deckled edges, simulated laid lines,  and even artificial brush marks to look like hand-dried sheets.  Personally I believe that these methods can help to attract consumers  to washi. However, what is deeply troublesome is when  manufacturers and distributors pass off these machinemade papers  as handmade and traditionally crafted washi. I have even  seen instances of Chinese and Thai papers labeled as washi by Japanese companies. Not only is this inaccurate, it is disrespectful of these countries’ own handmade paper traditions.

There  are many historically named types of washi: Tengujo, Usumino,  Kizukishi, Sekishu, Hosho, Hosokawa, Kochi, Mulberry, Kitakata,  Okawara, Uda, and Misu, to name a few. While these  names seem very specific, it is not enough to judge paper by  name only because paper varies from maker to maker. Once my  family’s company had an inquiry about Usumino from a client who told me that it would be used for the restoration of an important  collection. I suggested a high-quality Usumino made by a  master papermaker in Mino (in Gifu prefecture). The paper is  made from top-grade Nasu kozo and cooked with soda ash.  The client responded with surprise, “Oh, your price is so high!  It’s almost three times as much as the one we used to get from  another source.” I asked him to send me a sample of the less  expensive Usumino. It was made from saa fiber (Thai kozo) mixed  with abaca and cooked with caustic soda, chemically bleached,  and dyed. It looked like a well-made paper: both the appearance  and texture were so much like top-grade Usumino. While  I feel this paper has its place, it should not be marketed as pre-IR  Usumino. Over time, oil spots may appear from the saa fiber  and the chemicals may degrade not only the paper but the “conserved”  object as well. Unfortunately, this scenario is all too common in the Japanese paper industry.

In the past few decades, other Asian countries have been making  inroads into the domestic and international marketplace for paper. Needless to say, Japan is not a developing country. It is impossible  for Japanese papermakers to compete in all markets in  terms of price. It seems that now is the time for Japanese papermakers  to pull out of the low-end market, and turn back to Seki  Masao (left), a senior papermaker in Kochi, is adjusting  his post of kozo paper with the help of the author.  March 2006.

Tamura  Hiroshi is a young papermaker and a Budhhist monk  living in his parents’ temple home. He came to papermaking  while researching cellulose in graduate school  where he specialized in biology. August 2006. pre-IR  production methods that make washi so special. It may b  the only way to survive in the market and to keep our real tradition alive. Pessimists  would say that the production of pre-IR washi is on  the decline, and they would blame it on the market. However, I  believe that the Japanese paper market can grow through two factors:  quality control and user education. Generally speaking, with  a few exceptions, Japanese papermakers are honest and good  at quality control. By continuing their work with pride, openness,  and fair business practices, they can secure the future of Japanese paper production.

Many people are apprehensive about the aging problem of the papermaking industry and the lack of young successors. In actuality,  there is good news as well as bad. The good news is that there are many young people entering the field. Traditionally, papermakers have been descendant papermakers. Today, many young papermakers are not from papermaking families but have chosen the profession over hundreds of others available to them. Some have come from previous occupations as printmakers, graphic  designers, interior designers, baseball players, actors,  biotechnologists, fishery scientists, and engineers. Many are  well-educated, having received university degrees, and in some  cases master’s degrees. This can also be said of today’s descendent  papermakers. Young papermakers have all chosen papermaking  as their career path because they are fascinated by the  tradition and quality of pre-IR washi. Their enthusiasm for papermaking  is strong. They are wonderful papermakers, both in  mind and technique. You will see their spirit in their paper. The  bad news is that young papermakers are deeply concerned about  the supply of domestic materials and papermaking tools.  We must find solutions to aging supplies of materials, tools,  and other components integral to pre-IR washi production. Also,  if senior papermakers take seriously the future of Japanese papermaking,  they must share opportunities with young papermakers.

Some  senior papermakers see the younger generation as  their competitors. Some hesitate to hand down knowledge and  some monopolize paper orders. There are young papermakers who  harbor bad thoughts about the older generation because the  senior papermakers have both fame and steady orders even though  they live on a pension and do not need the extra income.

Both  standpoints are reasonable, but what the market needs is a solid  continuous supply of high-quality paper and skilled craftsmen to  sustain the future of the industry. On  the consumer side, limited access to information has led to a  sluggish demand of pre-IR washi. To reverse this situation, consumer  education should be the highest priority for the Japanese paper  industry. One can say that washi is like wine. People choose  different wine for different occasions. There are varieties of  inexpensive wines for an everyday meal, but for a special dinner,  people enjoy drinking a refined, more expensive wine. Post-IR  washi is suitable for hobbies, crafts, and everyday uses and  pre-IR washi is for more luxurious or serious endeavors. The  taste of wine varies according to the vineyard, type of grapes, whether  they are organic or not, the year of the crop, and so on. In  the end, the price reflects these factors. Paper is the same. Its  qualities and nuances depend on the soil, the weather, the  types  of fiber, year of the crop, minerals in the water, the cooking agent,  and the papermaker’s skill. Pre-IR washi is environmentally friendly  in terms of its processing, beautiful to look at, pleasant  to work with, and lasts for centuries. How can people resist  it?

In  the end, demand drives the industry. With their encouragement and  patronage, well-informed consumers can helpkeep  the pre-IR washi industry alive. Then both the future of the maker  and that of the user will be very bright. Hayashi  Shinji, a graduate of the papermaking training  program in Kurodani, now teaches papermaking  to graduate students at the Kyoto

Traditional  Crafts School. March 2006.

Wada  Tokiwa, a graduate of the papermaking training program at the Tosa  Washi Craft Village in Kochi prefecture, is drying paper on wood boards.  She studied printmaking during university and continues to makes  prints. August 2006 .